Attachment Style Test (ECR-RS)

9 questions· 2 minutes· Instant results
Free Private Runs locally No sign-up

The Experiences in Close Relationships-Relationship Structures (ECR-RS) is a 9-item attachment measure developed by R. Chris Fraley, Melanie E. Heffernan, Amanda M. Vicary, and Claudia C. Brumbaugh at the University of Illinois, published in Psychological Assessment in 2011. It is one of the most widely used modern attachment instruments in research.

9 Questions How you relate to the people closest to you, rated on a 1 to 7 agreement scale.
2D Dimensions Scored on anxiety (fear of abandonment) and avoidance (discomfort with depending on others).
4 Styles Attachment Style Secure, anxious, dismissive-avoidant, or fearful-avoidant based on where you sit on both dimensions.

Your style is a pattern, not a verdict. Attachment styles fall on a spectrum and can shift over time with new relationships, life events, and inner work. Many people move toward secure attachment through therapy or through spending time with people who show up reliably.

Your information is safe and private

Your answers are processed locally in your browser. No data is collected or sent to any server. No login account or email is required and results are available instantly. This test is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute a clinical assessment.

Disclaimer

This test is based on the Experiences in Close Relationships-Relationship Structures (ECR-RS) and is for informational and educational purposes only. Attachment styles are patterns of relating, not clinical diagnoses. This tool does not constitute medical or psychological advice. If you are concerned about your relationships or wellbeing, please consider speaking with a qualified mental health professional.

FAQs

What is the ECR-RS?

The Experiences in Close Relationships-Relationship Structures (ECR-RS) is a 9-item measure of adult attachment developed by R. Chris Fraley, Marie E. Heffernan, Amanda M. Vicary, and Claudia C. Brumbaugh at the University of Illinois, and published in Psychological Assessment in 2011. It is one of the most widely used modern attachment instruments in research.

What are the four attachment styles?

  • Secure: low anxiety, low avoidance. Comfortable with closeness and with independence.
  • Anxious (preoccupied): high anxiety, low avoidance. Craves closeness, fears abandonment.
  • Dismissive-avoidant: low anxiety, high avoidance. Values independence, uncomfortable with emotional depth.
  • Fearful-avoidant (disorganised): high anxiety, high avoidance. Wants closeness but fears it, often associated with earlier relational trauma.

How is this test scored?

You rate 9 statements on a 1 to 7 scale. Items about relying on others are reverse-scored so that higher means more avoidance. Your avoidance score is the mean of the 6 avoidance items, and your anxiety score is the mean of the 3 anxiety items. Each score runs from 1.0 to 7.0. The midpoint of 4.0 is used to split each dimension into low and high, which gives the four-category label. Both the continuous scores and the categorical label are shown on your results page.

Can your attachment style change?

Yes. Research by Fraley and others shows attachment patterns shift with new relationships, life events, therapy, and deliberate self-work. Earned security, where someone moves from an insecure to a secure pattern, is a well-documented outcome.

Is this a diagnosis?

No. Attachment styles are not mental health diagnoses. They are patterns of how you tend to relate to the people closest to you. The ECR-RS is a research-validated self-report measure that gives you a snapshot of your current orientation, not a permanent label and not a clinical assessment.

How accurate is it?

The ECR-RS has strong psychometric properties in published research, with good internal consistency and stability over time. Any self-report is limited by how honestly and how consistently you answer, and by which relationships you have in mind while answering. Think of your score as a reliable but not final snapshot.

What is the difference between attachment style and love language?

Attachment style describes how you relate under stress in close relationships and has decades of academic research behind it. Love languages, popularised by Gary Chapman, describe how you like to give and receive affection. Both are frameworks for understanding yourself in relationships, but attachment is the more rigorously studied.

Can two avoidant partners have a healthy relationship?

It is possible but tends to be fragile. Two people high in avoidance may both withdraw under stress and struggle to repair after conflict. Growth usually requires sustained effort to communicate directly and stay emotionally open, often supported by therapy.

How do I move toward secure attachment?

Common pathways include therapy with an attachment-informed therapist, spending time in relationships with securely attached people, building self-awareness of your triggers, practicing direct communication about needs and limits, and self-regulation techniques for managing the anxiety or withdrawal impulses that show up under stress.

Is my data stored anywhere?

No. OmLumi has a strong commitment to user privacy and does not collect any personal data. All scoring happens entirely in your browser using JavaScript. Your answers are never transmitted to any server, stored in a database, or shared with any third party. No account or login is required, and results are available instantly. When you close the tab, your answers are gone.

REFERENCES

Hazan C, Shaver P. Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1987;52(3):511-524. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511

Bartholomew K, Horowitz LM. Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1991;61(2):226-244. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226

Fraley RC, Heffernan ME, Vicary AM, Brumbaugh CC. The Experiences in Close Relationships-Relationship Structures Questionnaire: a method for assessing attachment orientations across relationships. Psychological Assessment. 2011;23(3):615-625. doi:10.1037/a0022898

Fraley RC, Heffernan ME, Vicary AM, Brumbaugh CC. Psychological Assessment. 2011;23(3):615-625.